Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
What would you choose: 1) investing FOR impact? 2) investing WITH impact? The first option focuses primarily on positive social impact with a range of intention for or without financial return, while the second one has impact as a secondary objective, subject to the achievement of a financial return. I do understand we in Lithuania still have a rare luxury to invest for social impact only. It is not because of the lack of HNWIs and their motivation to share their fortune for the “bigger good” but also because of the vast majority of social entrepreneurs still do their projects betting on grants only with formal or even non-existing [real] accountability. And we are trapped: donors rarely request that accountability, as trust dominates, grant receivers have no intention to make an extra mile showing and/or proving their impact achieved as their projects last for the grant period.

Appreciate
Comment
Book

Mangirdas AdomaitisArtificial inteligence, Data science
2) investing WITH impact. I do agree most FOR impact investments unfortunatelly fails.. Actually i cant remember big FOR imact investment successes at all. what are best successes?
9 months ago
·
Appreciate
Marius ČiuželisInvestor / Advisor / Social Entrepreneur
Mangirdas, I’m very biased and will always point to one: it’s SIDABRINE LINIJA. It’s a social or philanthropy project aiming exclusively ONLY for social impact: to offer elderly people free of charge regular befriending calls, protect, support and empower those who suffer abuse and neglect, provide them with information, friendship and advise, clear the air for the good mood and a better health. It doesnt recycle capital or offer any financial return and lives on grants/donations only.
9 months ago
·
Appreciate

Download Qoorio to talk & learn from other Humans
MORE INSIGHTS YOU MIGHT LIKE
Learn more by discovering other insights
Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
No-one should have no-one! I noted that slogan almost 5 years ago at The Silver Line in UK where we then were cordially accepted and showed around. Soon after similar service was born in Lithuania. Today we mark yet another "no-one should have no-one" milestone extending our local Silver Line's - a social project we run since 2016 - working hours to 14 hours on working days (+2 hours, 8am-10pm) and starting weekends with 8 hours of reach (11am-7pm). Due to a year-long pandemic and severe quarantine restrictions, the number of callers to the line has doubled seeking for emotional and informational support. More to add we have been receiving more and more calls during "after-hours". This has led us to move forward and extend call center working hours so that the necessary telephone support for older people is available as soon as possible. Read more here (in Lithuanian): https://www.sidabrinelinija.lt/lt/naujienos/naujienos/2021/03/sidabrine-linija-senjoru-skambuciu-laukia-ir-savaitgaliais
„Sidabrinė linija“ senjorų skambučių laukia ir savaitgaliais
www.sidabrinelinija.lt
5

Appreciate
Comment
Book
Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
Philanthropy is a buyers’ market, and nonprofit leaders are seldom in a position to negotiate aggressively with potential donors. On the contrary, the selection process is (and feels) quite one sided, as though potential grantees are participating in a beauty contest in which the only imperative is to please the judges. So, for better or worse, the views of an individual donor (especially a very large one) can strongly influence grantee behavior. Often this influence will take the form of tweaks to an existing program, or the addition of a new activity, more or less aligned with the nonprofit’s existing strategy, about which a leading donor is enthusiastic. When such an intervention is supported on the donor’s part by deep knowledge of the field, it can provide helpful input to the grantee’s strategy. Friday has started with an email from the Ministry of Social Affairs: We would like to inform you your project was reviewed by our experts, it met all requirements and we would like to offer you to sign financing agreement. That means M. Čiuželio labdaros ir paramos fondas (M. Ciuzelis Charity Foundation) won the biggest in its 5 years history financing tender for Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line) - a free of charge be-friending and support helpline providing information, friendship and advise for the old age people. Without any further conditions, the way we presented and wished to implement our project. The day just couldn’t be any better. Thank you

Appreciate
Comment
Book

Ronaldas BuožisCinematography, tech and boats
Congrats!
Appreciate
Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
The Minister of Social Security and Labour Monika Navickienė became the Patron of our core social project the Silver Line. That's a milestone achievement for us as it followed a tender we won last week to finance a whole year budget of the project. Long live the Minister! Long live the Silver Line! https://www.sidabrinelinija.lt/lt/naujienos/naujienos/2021/02/ministre-monika-navickiene-sidabrines-linijos-globeja
Ministrė Monika Navickienė – „Sidabrinės linijos“ globėja
www.sidabrinelinija.lt
6

Appreciate
Comment
Book
Download Qoorio to talk & learn from other Humans
How it works?HelpGet Qoorio appJoin Qoorio
We use cookies to personalise content, provide social media features, and analyse our traffic. We value your privacy and only use the most necessary and analytical cookies. You can opt out at any time.