Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
What would you choose: 1) investing FOR impact? 2) investing WITH impact? The first option focuses primarily on positive social impact with a range of intention for or without financial return, while the second one has impact as a secondary objective, subject to the achievement of a financial return. I do understand we in Lithuania still have a rare luxury to invest for social impact only. It is not because of the lack of HNWIs and their motivation to share their fortune for the “bigger good” but also because of the vast majority of social entrepreneurs still do their projects betting on grants only with formal or even non-existing [real] accountability. And we are trapped: donors rarely request that accountability, as trust dominates, grant receivers have no intention to make an extra mile showing and/or proving their impact achieved as their projects last for the grant period.

Appreciate
Comment
Book

Mangirdas AdomaitisArtificial inteligence, Data science
2) investing WITH impact. I do agree most FOR impact investments unfortunatelly fails.. Actually i cant remember big FOR imact investment successes at all. what are best successes?
about 1 year ago
·
Appreciate
Marius ČiuželisInvestor / Advisor / Social Entrepreneur
Mangirdas, I’m very biased and will always point to one: it’s SIDABRINE LINIJA. It’s a social or philanthropy project aiming exclusively ONLY for social impact: to offer elderly people free of charge regular befriending calls, protect, support and empower those who suffer abuse and neglect, provide them with information, friendship and advise, clear the air for the good mood and a better health. It doesnt recycle capital or offer any financial return and lives on grants/donations only.
about 1 year ago
·
Appreciate
MORE INSIGHTS YOU MIGHT LIKE
Learn more by discovering other insights
Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
Philanthropy is a buyers’ market, and nonprofit leaders are seldom in a position to negotiate aggressively with potential donors. On the contrary, the selection process is (and feels) quite one sided, as though potential grantees are participating in a beauty contest in which the only imperative is to please the judges. So, for better or worse, the views of an individual donor (especially a very large one) can strongly influence grantee behavior. Often this influence will take the form of tweaks to an existing program, or the addition of a new activity, more or less aligned with the nonprofit’s existing strategy, about which a leading donor is enthusiastic. When such an intervention is supported on the donor’s part by deep knowledge of the field, it can provide helpful input to the grantee’s strategy. Friday has started with an email from the Ministry of Social Affairs: We would like to inform you your project was reviewed by our experts, it met all requirements and we would like to offer you to sign financing agreement. That means M. Čiuželio labdaros ir paramos fondas (M. Ciuzelis Charity Foundation) won the biggest in its 5 years history financing tender for Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line) - a free of charge be-friending and support helpline providing information, friendship and advise for the old age people. Without any further conditions, the way we presented and wished to implement our project. The day just couldn’t be any better. Thank you

Appreciate
Comment
Book

Ronaldas BuožisCinematography, tech and boats
Congrats!
Appreciate
Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
If you haven't decided yet whom to support with a share of your personal income tax paid, pls take a look at the Sidabrinė linija video and we'd appreciate your contribution very much on behalf of 4000+ elderly people who already enjoy regular befriending calls or have access to emotional support when needed. Below information is provided in Lithuanian. „Tas parodytas dėmesys visiškai nuotoliniu būdu pažįstamai močiutei – va šitai mane labai sujaudino“, – sako Saigūnė, 87 m. „Sidabrinės linijos“ pašnekovė. ❤️ Tokių kaip ji – tūkstančiai. Tačiau senolių, kurie nepatiria bendravimo džiaugsmo, jaučia nuolatinę atskirtį ir vienišumą – dar daugiau. Kartu mes galime sumažinti jų vienišumą! Skirkite 1,2 % GPM „Sidabrinei linijai“ ir prisidėkite prie šios gerumo misijos. 🙏 Paramos gavėjas: M. Čiuželio labdaros ir paramos fondas. Gavėjo kodas: 303474437. Paskirtis: „Sidabrinei linijai“. Pateikti prašymą galite prisijungę prie savo asmeninės EDS paskyros ir užpildę FR0512 formą arba sekdami mūsų instrukciją, kurią rasite čia: https://www.sidabrinelinija.lt/gpm-parama/skirti-gpm-parama #GPMparama #Mažiauvienišumo #Ačiū
2

Appreciate
Comment
Book
Marius Čiuželis on Sidabrinė linija (the Silver Line)Investor / Advisor / Social EntrepreneurSome time ago
The Minister of Social Security and Labour Monika Navickienė became the Patron of our core social project the Silver Line. That's a milestone achievement for us as it followed a tender we won last week to finance a whole year budget of the project. Long live the Minister! Long live the Silver Line! https://www.sidabrinelinija.lt/lt/naujienos/naujienos/2021/02/ministre-monika-navickiene-sidabrines-linijos-globeja
Ministrė Monika Navickienė – „Sidabrinės linijos“ globėja
www.sidabrinelinija.lt
6

Appreciate
Comment
Book
Download Qoorio to talk & learn from other Humans
Sign inJoin Qoorio
We use cookies to personalise content, provide social media features, and analyse our traffic. We value your privacy and only use the most necessary and analytical cookies. You can opt out at any time.